Check out our Video on this topic here!
Many retirees might not realize it yet, but one of the biggest tax implications you can face after in your years after working is that of Required Minimum Distributions.
You’ve spent decades saving and letting those accounts grow tax-deferred, and then the IRS comes knocking, saying: it’s time to start taking money out—whether you need it or not.
The catch is, every dollar is taxed as ordinary income, and those withdrawals in some cases can cascade you into higher tax brackets, bigger Medicare premiums, and even more taxes on your Social Security.
That’s why in today’s blog we’re going to cover how RMDs work, when they start, why they can grow so large, the exact strategies for you to consider that could end up helping you to take control of the situation.
Let’s start with the basics, because the mechanics of RMDs is where we see many folks either get confused or pick up half-truths.
As it stands today, if you were born between the years 1951 and 1959, your RMDs begin at age 73. If you were born in 1960 or later, the first RMD won’t be due until age 75. That is important because it creates two distinct groups of retirees with different planning windows before distributions kick in.
So why does the government require RMDs at all? It goes back to how traditional retirement accounts are structured.
In the case of an individual retirement account or IRA, you may have received a tax deduction for the year your contributions were made and in the case of a workplace retirement plan, both you and your employer, if they contributed to your account, may have received tax deductions when those contributions went in. This money then potentially grew tax-deferred for decades.
At some point, the IRS wants to collect on all of that untaxed growth. RMDs are their mechanism to enforce an end to the tax holiday and make sure deferred tax revenue eventually comes back to the Treasury.
The way the actual calculation works can also be important to understand. It isn’t a flat percentage across your life, and it isn’t optional.
Each year, the IRS looks at the account balance at the end of the previous year and that figure is divided by a life expectancy factor published in their uniform lifetime table.
Earlier on, in your seventies, that factor may be around 25 or so, meaning about four percent of your account must be distributed.
But as you age and the divisor shrinks, the required percentage grows steadily. And if you don’t take the required amount you could end up staring at a stiff twenty-five percent penalty.
Ultimately while the rule is simple when you understand it, it can feel elusive: Every year, the IRS looks at your account balance, then divides it by a life expectancy factor that gets a little smaller each year.
So at age 73 or age 75 depending on the year you were born, your mandatory withdrawal might be around four percent.
By the time you’re 85, that could be closer to seven percent. And push into your 90s, and it may exceed ten percent of whatever balance remains.
But here’s where it catches people off guard. Early in retirement you may not notice the withdrawals since they resemble a modest drawdown.
Now fast forward ten or fifteen years, when your spending could actually be declining, the government is simultaneously telling you: “take more.”
And although this could end up being a useful paycheck for some, it can also become a tax trigger for others.
It’s important to keep in mind that this isn’t treated as investment income like dividends or capital gains. These distributions count as ordinary income which means they’re fully taxable just like wages.
Now you might be thinking: “Okay, if the rules are the rules, is there anything I can do?” And here’s the important point: you can’t stop RMDs once they begin, but you can take steps before and even during retirement to blunt their growth.
That’s exactly why we feel that early planning can be crucial.
The years between when you retire and when mandatory distributions kick in could be opportunities to reposition assets, manage taxable income, and create a strategy to try and mitigate your RMDs down the line.
Two impactful tools we’ve seen time and time again for this are Roth conversions and Qualified Charitable Distributions.
Let’s start with Roth conversions. A Roth conversion is when you take money from a pre‑tax retirement account—like a traditional IRA—and move it into a Roth IRA.
The catch is that whatever amount you convert is taxable in the year of the conversion. You pay taxes now, at your current bracket, on that sum.
And although paying taxes now feels like a tremendous downside, once inside the Roth, all future growth and withdrawals are tax‑free providing you meet the requirements.
And unlike traditional IRAs, Roth IRAs have no Required Minimum Distributions during your lifetime.
So why does this matter for RMD planning? Because if you can gradually convert portions of your IRA into Roth assets before RMDs begin, you could end up shrinking the size of or even eliminating your pre-tax balance.
A smaller pre‑tax balance in theory could mean smaller mandatory withdrawals and by planning with intention, you could end up paying tax on your own terms, instead of waiting until the IRS sets the timetable.
Now let’s switch gears and look at Qualified Charitable Distributions, or QCDs. This is one of those hidden shortcuts that many retirees miss.
Once you reach age seventy and a half, you can donate directly from your IRA to a qualified charity—up to $108,000 per year for 2025—and that donation counts toward your RMD requirement.
The brilliance here is that the money leaves your IRA without ever touching your taxable income.
It doesn’t flow through your adjusted gross income, it just goes directly from the account to the charity, and the IRS counts it as satisfying your RMD.
Why is this such a big deal? Because most retirees who give to charity are used to writing checks from their checking account, then trying to claim deductions on their taxes.
But since the standard deduction has increased, very few retirees itemize anymore, meaning their charitable gifts don’t actually reduce their taxes.
With a QCD, every dollar given directly offsets your RMD dollar for dollar while lowering your taxable income.
So which tool should you focus on—Roth conversions or QCDs? The answer depends on your personal goals.
If reducing your own long‑term tax burden and leaving tax‑free assets to heirs is most important, Roth conversions usually win.
If you’re charitably inclined and want to manage year‑to‑year taxable income efficiently, QCDs are often more effective.
Many retirees actually use both: conversions earlier in retirement to shrink future balances, and then QCDs after seventy and a half to handle distributions efficiently.
It’s not an either/or—it’s about matching the right lever to the right time.
And here’s the part that keeps the planning dynamic: both strategies give you control where the RMD rules strip control away.
Instead of passively waiting for the IRS to dictate how much taxable income you’ll have, Roth conversions let you decide when and how much tax to pay.
QCDs let you support causes you care about while lowering your income number.
The common theme is proactive choice versus reactive burden.
The Final Word:
RMDs are unavoidable, but they don’t have to overwhelm you or your heirs. By understanding how they work, anticipating how they escalate, and using strategies like Roth conversions and Qualified Charitable Distributions, you can limit tax damage during retirement and ease the inheritance burden on your family.
This is about control—choosing when and how you pay taxes, instead of letting the IRS dictate terms. Think of it as protecting both your lifestyle today and the legacy you’ll leave tomorrow. Smart planning now creates flexibility later, for you and those who come after you.
As always, we would suggest speaking with your financial and tax professionals to come up with a plan that is right for you!
Thanks for reading!
Disclaimer:
Rockline Wealth Management (RWM) is a registered investment adviser located in Islip Terrace, NY. RWM is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission.
Rockline Wealth Management does not offer tax or legal services. The information in this material is not intended as tax or legal advice. Please consult legal or tax professionals for specific information regarding your individual situation.
All information presented is believed to be factual at the date of publication. This blog should not be viewed as advice for any individual and is intended for general informational purposes only.
All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment or strategy will be suitable or profitable for a client's investment portfolio.
Asset allocation and diversification do not ensure or guarantee better performance and cannot eliminate the risk of investment losses. The opinions expressed and material provided are for general information and should not be considered a solicitation of financial advice or for the purchase or sale of any security.
Real-life and fictional examples given in this blog should not be viewed as guaranteed outcomes when investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results and every individual’s investment circumstances are different. Individuals should consult their financial professional before implementing their investment plan.
Certain information contained herein constitutes “forward-looking statements,” which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “project,” “estimate,” “intend,” “continue,” or “believe,” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events, results or actual performance may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Nothing contained herein may be relied upon as a guarantee, promise, assurance or a representation as to the future.